Contact of hiv male penpals
But all things equal, male-to-female transmission is approximately two to eight times more efficient than the reverse. All that is required is the right numbers coming up or in the case of HIV transmission, the right physiological scenario [port of entry] to occur. So, finally [whew, I am out of breath,] and respectfully I ask, is it not irresponsible to be throwing those stats around knowing that people will use it to rationalize unsafe behavior? Yes, the Bush Administration has cut off funding to some very effective AIDS prevention programs in the Bay Area, such as the Stop AIDS Project. Hence, the up to eight-fold difference in male-to-female, compared to female-to-male, transmission. Is that a risk anyone, hetero or gay, wants to take, considering a thin piece of latex is all it takes to drastically alter the odds?
With respectfully and with admiration, A fiend that learned the hard way....
It could be something as simple as a run away script or learning how to better use E-utilities, for more efficient work such that your work does not impact the ability of other researchers to also use our site.
During a median follow-up of 630 days, 43 men became HIV-positive.Similarly, omission of the data from men of the Luo ethnic group, who have low levels of circumcision, did not affect their conclusions.Finally, the investigators tested their assumptions that the men did not have sex with their casual partners more than once during follow-up and that condom use reduced the likelihood of HIV transmission by 85%.Many studies have found that circumcision can reduce an individual man’s risk of contracting HIV, but it remains uncertain whether this effect could be caused by circumcised and uncircumcised men having different sexual behaviour.To resolve these issues, investigators from Kenya and the United States carried out a prospective study of HIV infection and sexual behaviour in a cohort of 745 Kenyan men.